![]() ![]() Some hunter advocacy groups rejected the decision, however, arguing it will affect predator management programs that aim to reduce predation. “These magnificent animals serve important roles in our Great Lakes ecosystems, and they show us that dedication to family is not unique to humans,” Nessel said in a statement. Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel, who took part in an amicus brief in the coalition’s lawsuit, said her state is home to roughly 700 gray wolves. “Our lawsuit argues that by treating the plight of these fragile populations as insignificant and ignoring the natural and manmade threats that wolves nationwide still face, the government is in violation of the Endangered Species Act and its legal duty of protecting wolves and helping them recover,” the statement read. The gray wolf received protection from the ESA in the 1970s, when the population dwindled due to declines in their populations and frequent conflict with farmers and ranchers.Ĭertain wolf populations on the West Coast and in the Southern Rocky Mountains are especially vulnerable and were at risk of “disappearing forever” as a result of the Trump-era decision, the Humane Society said in a statement when the lawsuit was filed. Six Native American Ojibwe tribes also sued the state of Wisconsin last year, claiming the state’s planned wolf hunts go against their treaty-protected rights, CNN previously reported.Īfter the species were stripped of federal protections, Wisconsin hunters killed more than 215 wolves in under three days as part of a February 2021 trophy hunting season, exceeding the state’s quote by nearly double, according to the Humane Society. Only the Northern Rockies population of wolves remains unprotected as a result of laws that passed in Idaho and Montana, according to the Humane Society, but the USFWS is currently considering relisting them to the act. The federal government has 60 days to appeal the court’s decision. “Instead of continuing to devise convoluted excuses to strip these beloved animals of legal protections, the agency must develop a plan for meaningful recovery across the species’ range and ensure that states will not decimate their wolf populations.” “After having yet another wolf delisting overturned in federal court, the US Fish and Wildlife Service should finally learn its lesson,” she added. “Today is a monumental victory for wolves who will now be protected from state-sponsored bloodbaths,” Kitty Block, president and CEO of the Humane Society, said in a statement. The lawsuit claimed the USFWS did not take proper consideration when it stripped the animal of Endangered Species Act (ESA) protections, which went into effect in January 2021, under the assumption its population sufficiently recovered. The US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) “failed to adequately analyze and consider the impacts of partial delisting and of historical range loss on the already-listed species,” White wrote in his decision, which restored gray wolf protections in 45 states. White in Northern California ruled in favor of a lawsuit brought by the Humane Society of the United States and other wildlife organizations against the US Department of the Interior in January 2021. ![]() On Thursday, US District Judge Jeffrey S. A federal judge reversed a Trump administration decision that removed the gray wolf from the endangered species list in the continental United States after a coalition of wildlife organizations argued the move seriously threatened the animal’s population.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |